The Cost Of Stimulus Computer Records Rule May Hamper Doctors; Ends Might Not Justify The Means

Electronic medical records-keeping was a small, but integral part of Obama's campaign.

To be honest, I think it's not that bad of an idea and certainly not the worst of Obama's proposals so far.

It makes sense that eliminating "red tape" may help ease some costs to insurance companies -- paper trails never make things easy -- thereby lowering the cost of health-care.

However, like much of Obama's policy and most of the stimulus; the details were not properly worked out ahead of time.

If only the Congress had time to read the bill... *sigh*....

Newsmax reports:

WASHINGTON -- Billions of stimulus dollars meant to spur doctors to switch to electronic record-keeping may not be enough to do the job, a private consulting firm said Monday.

The stimulus bill that President Barack Obama signed last month contained $19 billion for health information technology, including $17 billion for incentives and penalties to encourage doctors and hospitals to abandon paper record-keeping and go high-tech beginning in 2011.

But particularly for doctors in small practices, the high cost of installing electronic records systems could outweigh the incentives and
penalties for failing to comply, the new analysis said.

The study by Avalere Health, an information company serving government and the health care industry, said as many as half these doctors might decide they are better off financially with the status quo.

"How rapidly will physician offices make these investments, particularly those smaller offices with less capital?" said Jon Glaudemans, a senior vice president at Avalere.

"Frankly if the choice is between continuing health insurance for your staff and buying a new IT system that gets paid back over five years, that's going to challenge an office manager or administrator anywhere in the country."

A Health and Human Services Department spokeswoman cited a Congressional Budget Office estimate that 90 percent of doctors would be using health IT by 2019 thanks to the stimulus bill.

"The investments are designed to help make new systems more affordable for doctors and were never intended to wholly subsidize the adoption of this technology," Jenny Backus said. "As the market for health IT expands, the costs for these systems will come down."

Using government cost estimates, Avalere researchers found that it would cost about $124,000 for a single doctor or small practice to upgrade to electronic health records over the five year period from 2011-2015 when the stimulus bill offers incentives to do so.

But the total incentive payments a doctor could get over that time period only add up to $44,000.

In 2015, penalties start to kick in for doctors who haven't switched to electronic record-keeping. But in one scenario mapped by Avalere, the starting penalty would be $5,100 a year _ far less than how much it would cost to install and maintain an electronic health system.

Add in the shaky economy, the uncertain outlook for a health care overhaul, and the government's failure to define, so far, what kind of electronic health systems will be deemed acceptable. Together they make switching to electronic record-keeping a leap of faith for some doctors, the analysis said.

.

Only politicians can take a good idea and make it stupid! And that's true for both political parties.