Yeah...
... elections have consequences.
Thank you, libs!
Dedicated to America. Fusion of Politics and Entertainment With Respect To: Protecting Self-evident Freedoms Provided by Our Founding Fathers and The Constitution. Devoted to Personal Freedom and Liberty. Supporting Strong National Defense. Encouraging Fiscal Responsibility, Limited Government, and Free Market Capitalism. Favoring "Smart" Energy Independence. Exposing Liberal Media Bias.
Ugh... I'm fresh out of anti-Madcow Mancow jokes.
It's amazing how much time she wastes on alcohol metaphors; not just in this instance but in general.
I guess being a slobbering Obama hack would lead one to drink. Just saying.
She totally has her facts wrong; another complete social distortion. MS NBC is off its rocker! Is Sotomayor a conservative, Maddow wonders? Is Hitler a Zionist? Seriously, WTF!?!?!?
And Barbara Boxer as the analyst? This is news? Wow!
This is a big problem! The woman not only thinks policy is made by judges, but that female, Latina judges are more qualified than white males!
Indeed, her story is wonderful and the quintessential American Dream: but that does not qualify her to be a Supreme Court Justice!
Like Obama, Sotomayor is radical beyond our wildest expectations.
Fox News analyst Tucker Carlson disapproves President Obama's nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. He thinks that race and gender were "major calculations" in that decision, and thinks she should explain comments she made about those qualifications being factors in making wiser decisions. "That's a racist statement... I'm not attacking her personally, and I said dumb things myself, many, many times...I still think she must explain why she went on the record saying that because of your race or gender you are a better judge. That female, Latina judges are more likely to render wiser decisions than white, male judges"
Bill Press defends the nomination, saying "we are achieving the greatness of the American dream," to which Tucker immediately called "absurd." Then he added, "I don't care if she's green, and a Buddhist..." Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum finishes his thought: "He wants Yoda for Supreme Court judge."
Other famous quotes from Sotomayor proving how "supremely" unqualified she is to be an impartial Justices:
“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor in 2001 at the annual Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California, Berkeley.
“Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”
She also approvingly quoted several law professors who said that “to judge is an exercise of power” and that “there is no objective stance but only a series of perspectives.” “Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see,” she said.
Judge Sotomayor questioned whether achieving impartiality “is possible in all, or even, in most, cases.” She added, “And I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society.”
In a forward to a 2007 book, “The International Judge” (U.P.N.E.), Judge Sotomayor seemed to put a greater emphasis on a need for judges to seek to transcend their identities, writing that “all judges have cases that touch our passions deeply, but we all struggle constantly with remaining impartial” and letting reason rule. Courts, she added, “are in large part the product of their membership and their judges’ ability to think through and across their own intellectual and professional backgrounds” to find common ground.
"What I want is not just ivory tower learning. I want somebody who has the intellectual firepower but also a little bit of a common touch and a practical sense of how the world works."
-- President Obama this past weekend.
"Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written. She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one's sex, race, and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench.
"She reads racial preferences and quotas into the Constitution, even to the point of dishonoring those who preserve our public safety. On September 11, America saw firsthand the vital role of America's firefighters in protecting our citizens. They put their lives on the line for her and the other citizens of New York and the nation. But Judge Sotomayor would sacrifice their claims to fair treatment in employment promotions to racial preferences and quotas. The Supreme Court is now reviewing that decision.
"She has an extremely high rate of her decisions being reversed, indicating that she is far more of a liberal activist than even the current liberal activist Supreme Court."
Wendy E. Long, counsel to the Judicial Confirmation Network, on nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.
Personally, I am impressed with the life story of Ms. Sotomayor. I give her a world of credit for rising to this level from where she began her life in The Bronx. In addition, I applaud the President's quest for diversity on the Court and congratulate Sotomayor for being the first Hispanic Justice.
However, despite her personal successes, she is not Supreme Court material. Even worse, thanks to the moronic voting populous in this nation, there is nothing we can do to stop this nomination from being confirmed.
Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Sotomayor, said on tape saying that the "court of appeals is where policy is made".
Really? Judges make policy? With all due respect, that's a complete and total misrepresentation of the Constitution! She even admits it, but if this isn't a prime example of judicial activism, I don't know what is!
But even worse, this is exactly the kind of radical mentality Liberals like Barack Obama support.
Elections have consequences!
From Conservative Nation:
Somebody needs to tell Sonia Sotomayor that the US Court Of Appeals is not a policy-making body.
Obama’s leading Supreme Court candidate said in 2005 that the “Court of appeals is where policy is made”. But it gets better, because she said it on tape. But wait, it gets even better, because she knew she was being taped and postscripted her comment with “…and I know this is on tape and i should never say that..”
Sotomayor is, apparently, not known to be among the brightest in her field, but to say something that is just so….counter to what the job of a court of appeals judge really is goes to demonstrate both her lack of respect for the judiciary and the degree to which she is unfit to sit on the Supreme Court.
Pick the next Supreme Court Justice and win some cash!
PaddyPower.com, an online gambling site, provides the odds.
Applies to the first nominee chosen by President Obama for Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court.
Others on request.
Dead Heat may apply should there be another position available and the president announces two nominees at the same time.
Sonia Sotomayor 13/8
Diane Pamela Wood 9/4
Elena Kagan 4/1
Kim McLane Wardlaw 9/2
Kathleen Sullivan 8/1
Leah Ward Sears 10/1
Merrick Garland 12/1
Ruben Castillo 14/1
Cass Sunstein 16/1
Deval Patrick 33/1
Harold Hongju Koh 20/1
Janet Napolitano 50/1
Hillary Clinton 100/1
Michelle Obama 500/1
RNC Chair Michael Steele gives his take on President Obama's desire for an "empathetic" Supreme Court nominee.
"I feel comfortable his choice will be as good as his cabinet selections," says Sen. Harry Reid on Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee.
That good, huh? Well that's pretty disheartening. Let me guess; the nominee will be a tax cheat with radical socialist beliefs who completely ignores the rule of law and The Constitution.
Full Video From "Today Show"
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
UPDATE: He Picked Her! Hide the kids!
Obama's likely Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor on tape saying that the "court of appeals is where policy is made".
Really? Judges make policy? With all due respect, that's a complete and total misrepresentation of the Constitution! She even admits it, but if this isn't a prime example of judicial activism, I don't know what is!
But even worse, this is exactly the kind of radical mentality Liberals like Barack Obama support.
Elections have consequences!
From Conservative Nation:
Somebody needs to tell Sonia Sotomayor that the US Court Of Appeals is not a policy-making body.
Obama’s leading Supreme Court candidate said in 2005 that the “Court of appeals is where policy is made”. But it gets better, because she said it on tape. But wait, it gets even better, because she knew she was being taped and postscripted her comment with “…and I know this is on tape and i should never say that..”
Sotomayor is, apparently, not known to be among the brightest in her field, but to say something that is just so….counter to what the job of a court of appeals judge really is goes to demonstrate both her lack of respect for the judiciary and the degree to which she is unfit to sit on the Supreme Court.
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT)appeared on "This Week" today to discuss President Obama's pick to replace Justice David Souter. He is concernced that Obama might pick a judicial activist instead of someone who bases decisions on the law.
Hatch claims that Obama's desire to choose a judge based on the nominee's "personal politics, personal feelings and personal preferences" are "code words for an activist judge who is going to be partisan on the bench".
I agree. To me, it sounds like he wants a judge who will rule on emotion rather than fact and that is dangerous. He wants someone who knows "what it means to have the system not work for them."
The Atlantic puts it this way:
Somewhat opaquely, Obama, a constitutional law lecturer, has said that the single most important qualification his appointments must possess is empathy for those who are less fortunate. In September, Obama told an audience that he is "committed to appointing judges who understand how law operates in our daily lives, judges who will uphold the values at the core of our Constitution."
President Obama abruptly interrupted today's White House Press Briefing to "do the job himself" and report his conversation with retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter.
I was kind of hoping he was going to fire Gibbs on the spot, but then again, I would miss the circus clown in action everyday with the press corps!
Justice David Souter announced yesterday he will retire this year.
Here is the flashback video from a Democratic Primary Debate.
To me, it sounds like he wants a judge who will rule on emotion rather than fact and that is dangerous. He wants someone who knows "what it means to have the system not work for them."
What the hell is he talking about?
The Atlantic puts it this way:
Somewhat opaquely, Obama, a constitutional law lecturer, has said that the single most important qualification his appointments must possess is empathy for those who are less fortunate. In September, Obama told an audience that he is "committed to appointing judges who understand how law operates in our daily lives, judges who will uphold the values at the core of our Constitution."
President Obama will get his first crack at nominating a Leftist Liberal Radical Activist Judge to America's highest court to replace retiring Justice David Souter.
NPR reports:
NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter is planning to retire at the end of the court's current term.
The court has completed hearing oral arguments for the year and will be issuing rulings and opinions until the end of June.
Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.
At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.
Now, according to reliable sources, he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision.
Souter's retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman.
The court currently has one female justice — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is recovering from cancer surgery.
Obama was elected with strong support from women.
An Obama pick would be unlikely to change the ideological makeup of the court. Souter, though appointed by the first President Bush, generally votes with the more liberal members of the court, a group of four that is in a rather consistent minority.